Warning: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in ..../includes/class_bbcode.php on line 2958

Warning: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in ..../includes/class_bbcode.php on line 2958

Warning: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in ..../includes/class_bbcode.php on line 2958
Stainless steel Versus ALuminum AMC roller Rockers?
Bulltear Ad
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Stainless steel Versus ALuminum AMC roller Rockers?

  1. #1

    Stainless steel Versus ALuminum AMC roller Rockers?

    So what is the best to run on a street strip motor? The alumium is light and supposed to be as strong as some of the steel? The steel are strong and supposed to be as light as some of the aluminum rockers, Ie comp cams stainless are advertised as being as light as alumium but more strength. I have seen crower stainless rockers for AMC that look light and strong. The harland sharps are supposed to be AMC specific and worth every penny? So I am a bit confused at this point whether I should run a lightened stainless rocker or an aluminum?

  2. #2
    Thank you from BT Junior wrench of the Forum
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    106
    Ok I have both stainless on the race car Alum on the street car .
    Cast alum are very week but bilit alum are stong and lite. I beleive the stainless is a good idea for extreme lift but for the street or below .650 lift I believe both are fine . The point you should look at is the size of the fulcrum bearing.In general the larger the better as long as there is still enough materal around it . me for my street car it was a $$$ thing more than a quality thing because I beleive most roller rockers are pretty darn good.
    just my 2 cents worth.

  3. #3
    I've run the Harland Sharps for a few years now without failures except that I'm not running the AMC version.
    I decided to bump up the lift a little and went with the Pontiac version with the 1.65 ratio instead of the stock 1.6 and squeezed the lift up from .490" to .505".

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by ol' school power
    I've run the Harland Sharps for a few years now without failures except that I'm not running the AMC version.
    I decided to bump up the lift a little and went with the Pontiac version with the 1.65 ratio instead of the stock 1.6 and squeezed the lift up from .490" to .505".
    Thank you. After going by RadAmx's info I studied some of the rockers and Harland Sharps and the Comp Cam stainless rockers look like they have the best bearing design definately a bigger fulcrum bearing in their rockers! Thanks RadAMX for pointing out what to look for! Others but not all havenoticeably smaller fulcrum roller bearings. I like the idea of the Comps extra strength but havent heard from anyone using them on the fit?
    Harland Sharps on the other hand have been highly praised by many AMC'ers so I'll probably go with them, ...So there isnt a 1.65 AMC specific harland sharp? If not I may be interested in a 1.65. although my cam already has 493 on the intake and 503 on th exaust. Were there any issues in installing the pontiac pieces or did they just install as is out of the box?? Thanks again for the tips!

  5. #5
    Before i purchased them, I called Harland and asked. They said no problem since the Pontiac has the exact same geometry. Only difference is that the Pontiacs use a stud with a 7/16 upper thread instead of the smaller 3/8. No problem since you're much better off with the larger OD. I've heard of too many freak failures with 3/8" studs.
    If you have the clearance for the higher lift, then go for it. Stock AMC heads flow well into the mid .500 lift range.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by ol' school power
    Before i purchased them, I called Harland and asked. They said no problem since the Pontiac has the exact same geometry. Only difference is that the Pontiacs use a stud with a 7/16 upper thread instead of the smaller 3/8. No problem since you're much better off with the larger OD. I've heard of too many freak failures with 3/8" studs.
    If you have the clearance for the higher lift, then go for it. Stock AMC heads flow well into the mid .500 lift range.
    Sounds good! Think I'll give the 1.65's a go! should bump my lift at the valve to .507 and .516 ...I think I like the idea of being able to "change" the lift and keep the same duration without changing the cam...me likey! =D>

  7. #7
    Thank you from BT Tech Master Bulltear Forum
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    In a Half Dark world now a days
    Posts
    1,437
    crower SS rocker



    best ever 11.669 @ 112.33 mph in 1/4 mile on 33 x 10.50 slicks and 4" lift / 7.358 @ 93.03 mph in the 1/8 mile

  8. #8
    Thank you from BT ULTRA TECH MASTER!!!
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Central City, Colorado
    Posts
    1,626
    Ok since the subject is opened. I'm going to expose my ignorance and ask, What would the advantage be to running roller rockers on the street be? or on the trail in a jeep. I basically understand the purpose of a R/R setup in high rpm. But I havent ever played with a set so..I'm kinda uneducated on the benefits.

    Thanks
    "A man's got to know his limitation's"

    Dirty Harry.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by fuzz401
    crower SS rocker


    Me likey THOSE!!! =D> Nice looking fulcrum It's going to be a tough decision I guess iy's goin to come to price and ratio selection but now I have all yhe info I need to make a good call, tank ya, tank ya tank ya, 0ne and all This motor is going to be stout! =D>

  10. #10
    Thank you from BT Tech Master Bulltear Forum
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    In a Half Dark world now a days
    Posts
    1,437
    Ok since the subject is opened. I'm going to expose my ignorance and ask, What would the advantage be to running roller rockers on the street be? or on the trail in a jeep. I basically understand the purpose of a R/R setup in high rpm. But I havent ever played with a set so..I'm kinda uneducated on the benefits.
    like racing any loss in friction helps with hp and tork

    best ever 11.669 @ 112.33 mph in 1/4 mile on 33 x 10.50 slicks and 4" lift / 7.358 @ 93.03 mph in the 1/8 mile

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Bulltear Ad