Bulltear Ad
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: Stainless steel Versus ALuminum AMC roller Rockers?

  1. #11
    Thank you from BT Junior wrench of the Forum
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    106
    You also have less guide wear because you are not draging the rocker across the tip of the valve.instead it rolls.
    You do end up with a little bit of valve train noise that was never there before .but it is not much.

  2. #12
    Thank you from BT ULTRA TECH MASTER!!!
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Central City, Colorado
    Posts
    1,626
    Ok, So essintially there is the "cool factor" which is not to be underated, but if you change ratios you can bump the specs on the cam a bit and essintially pick up a ponie or two with somewhat less valvetrain wear.
    Thanks.. I always wanted to ask just never had the chance. I just thought it was along the lines of folks buying the "noisy" gear drives over the quiet ones.
    "A man's got to know his limitation's"

    Dirty Harry.

  3. #13
    Thank you from BT ULTIMUS MAXIMUS STATUS jeepsr4ever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    10,042
    I found acceleration and power developement to increase with the use of roller rockers. I would reccommend the larger hole roller for high lift cams. I have gotten gains on a small lift camshaft but not enough to justify the use of a roller rocker.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Bulltear Ad