Warning: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in ..../includes/class_bbcode.php on line 2968

Warning: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in ..../includes/class_bbcode.php on line 2962
Getting Enough Oil
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Getting Enough Oil

  1. #1
    I have a question about the oiling issues on an AMC 360. I am rebuilding my AMC 360 and have heard and really know for a fact that the rear mains do not get enough oil. I will have everything in it new and have been doing a lot of reading and it is confusing me more than helping me. Here are my questions: (please be detailed as possible on all questions)

    1. What oil mods do you want to do to fix the rear mains not getting enough oil?
    2. What does it mean by cross drilling your crankshaft?
    3. Where do you drill holes at for the distributor gear to get more oil?
    4. What other mods would be recomended?

    I have a new crankshaft, RV cam, 30 over pistons, oil pump, and the basics that come with a rebuild kit. I also have TBI and edlebrock intake. Please give me any help you can.

    Thanks,
    Brad Beyer

  2. #2
    Thank you from BT ULTIMUS MAXIMUS STATUS jeepsr4ever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    10,042
    Crossdrilling a AMC V8 crankshaft should NEVER be done without other heavy mods already in place. One mod you should consider is either the smaller hole cam bearings or the valley line and always start with a good close tolerance cover. Those two mods, starting with a good cover and running either smaller hole cam bearings or a valley line are the only ones we will reccommend below 6000rpms
    [COLOR=#000000]
    Featuring www.StarLabCNC.com[/URL] for CNC plasma machines
    1-651-433-3689 TOLL FREE 1-855-433-3689

  3. #3

    cross drilling crank

    Please elaborate on the pros/cons of cross drilling the crank. I have some old literature from Randall that mentions grooving the main journals. I have also read about drilling out the rod journal centers.
    Thanks, Seth

    68 AMX 390 4-spd & rally pac

  4. #4
    Thank you from BT ULTIMUS MAXIMUS STATUS jeepsr4ever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    10,042
    Seth a good set of mains will have the top journal grooved. The bottom journal takes the brunt of the force from the combusiton chamber firing. The reason people do not crossdrill their mains is becasue the rods are fed through the mains and if you cant get oil to the rods you spin a bearing. The main bearings are larger and require much more oil than a rod based on a term called bearing speed which the mains have a much higher bearing speed per revolution because of their size compared to the rod bearings. Take the width of the bearing and the diameter and then calculate the revolutions per minute (RPM) and figure in a .001" of lubrication around the bearing and you end up with a very large number surface area per minute that the bearing needs. Then you can take the hole size (.319") feeding the mains and generalize a psi for the rpm your calculating for and you can get your oil flow requirements. Keep in mind the rod comes after the mains as it is crossdrilled to the main journal.

    Does that help?
    [COLOR=#000000]
    Featuring www.StarLabCNC.com[/URL] for CNC plasma machines
    1-651-433-3689 TOLL FREE 1-855-433-3689

  5. #5
    Still a bit confused. I thought that crossdrilling the mains allows more oil to the rods by connecting the two rod feedholes on #2,3&4 main journals and makink a new feed hole on mains 1&5. So, the crux is if the mains are crossdrilled so that rods get oil for 360 degress instead of 180 the mains will be starved.Also, although each rod would get continuous oil, the pressure would be lower since the volume would always be split,on #23&4. I am assuming that rods normally do not get much oil when the feedhole is traversing the lower bearing shell.Under what conditions is crossdrilling the crank beneficial? My other question was about just machining a narrow groove in the main journal, not having a grooved lower bearing shell. Also I am still wondering about drilling the rod throw to lighten that part of the crank.

    Another question involves the report that rod bearings no longer have the notch to feed the squirt holes. were the factory engineers overdoing the amount of cylinder lubrication? It seems that alot of oil drains through the cam tunnel holes and many people try to divert oil from the valve covers directly to the sump which suggests that drainback through the tunnel holes is not necessary to lube cam lobes etcetera. My question is if the squirt holes are disabled and oil is diverted away from the lifter valley will the cam lobes & cylinder walls get enough oil? In general, will rod bearing clearance need to be increased without the squirt holes?

    I noticed that you offer a crankscraper. Is the scraper only for very high performance apps or does it benefit a more moderate engine too?

    Thanks, Seth

  6. #6
    Thank you from BT ULTIMUS MAXIMUS STATUS jeepsr4ever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    10,042
    There in lies the problem. The main lines can only supply a certain amount of oil at 60psi with their stock diameter. We open up the last 3 mains to .339 which is .020 larger than the stock .319. After calculating the flow requirements this is the solution I have concieved.

    Crank scrapers keep your crank case from foaming past the centerline of the crank and are good at any RPM.
    [COLOR=#000000]
    Featuring www.StarLabCNC.com[/URL] for CNC plasma machines
    1-651-433-3689 TOLL FREE 1-855-433-3689

  7. #7
    So if oil feed to the main bearings is increased, crossdrilling the crank is acceptable. My intention is to rebuild the engine with a moderate roller cam and have a redline around 6500. The shop which rebuilt the engine back in '84 supposedly installed the valley line and maybe drilled the main galley from the pickup to the pump.Still curious about cylinder wall oiling without squirt holes and diverting oil from the lifter valley. I know that some engines rely on oil throw-off from the rod journals to keep cylinders lubed. Was AMC simply providing extra oil as insurance for the rings? My concern is limiting windage without starving the rings or cam lobes

    thanks, seth

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    '69 AMX 12.60@107 - Ohio, unfortunately (:-P)
    Posts
    942
    I'm no expert, but the rod brg oil notch can be added by hand if desired to new rod brgs that lack this feature. Think it was 1980_CJ that did this on his 401 2nd rebuild this year due to timing chain installation sna-fu. It appears to be an ongoing debate as to the need for the con rod oil squirter or not.

    Wonder what 82Waggy did on the new motor he just built ?
    '69 AMX #11,856 BSO/Saddle 343-4V Auto Go-Pak A/C Leather
    http://home.fuse.net/ckthomas/AMXSIG5.jpg

  9. #9
    Thank you from BT ULTIMUS MAXIMUS STATUS jeepsr4ever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    10,042
    Oil holes in the rods add way too much oil to the spinning mass with all the foaming happening. You can run a crank scraper with oil holes (Which is ideal for high rpm)
    [COLOR=#000000]
    Featuring www.StarLabCNC.com[/URL] for CNC plasma machines
    1-651-433-3689 TOLL FREE 1-855-433-3689

  10. #10

    rod bearing oil feed

    Inspection of a 401 crank revealed that rods 1,3,5 &7 have their oil feed hole within the upper main bearing when the piston is at TDC. Rods 2,4,6&8 have their oil feed hole traversing the lower main bearing at TDC. This suggests that rods 2,4,6&8 are somewhat starved for oil during the power stroke, which probably is not desireable. That is why I am curious about cross-drilling the crank. Tom Monroe published a book about race engines and he states that cross-drilling is important but does not elaborate about other oiling system mods. that would be necessary to increase total flow to the bearings; Mr. Monroe was a chief engineer on the Bricklin project.

    thanks, seth

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Bulltear Ad